some of these things have a disparate quality within one descriptior; others are just a 'collective' overview of the disparate nature of now.
maybe let's start off with the definition of disparate
essentially different in kind; not able to be compared:"they inhabit disparate worlds of thought"
the other day, and I have no idea why, I passed out in the street. when I woke up, there were people standing over me, asking if I needed anything, like an ambulance or a glass of water. all I could think of was the dead bird on the way to the post office before I passed out. It was obvious the creature had been hit by a car, but then the overriding question; of all the wild birds that are alive in the world, and there must be millions, where do they go to die? Is there some order meaning that when a certain amount are born, there is some enforced attrition and for a certain population of birds it's sorry, but it's time to go? there is an obvious order to us beyond the service, whether it be burial or cremation and then in the form of the cemetery. there are no bird cemeteries or even for that matter, formal places for wild animals as a whole.
just today and without going into detail I was seeking a legal remedy in a civil matter. aside from the interruptions which destroy my train of conversation and moreover, thought, when the solicitor who was advising me spoke, there was only one thing going through my mind - his metaphors were crap. Not so much that they were not reflective of the common person or even the average person, as subjective as those descriptors may be, but they had this overall feel of examples from his world, with the only overall descriptor I could proffer as 'planet law', full of it's expertise and experience but no understanding of 'now' . then his comparison of email messages to physical junk mail in the letter box came across as somewhat naieve. like I was reporting something in it's infancy, even with organisations like an ombudsman to monitor certain behaviour.
TikTok. maybe part of me thinks whoever is reading this may say to themselves, no need to take this any further - we understand, but I will elaborate. simply put, there is no overall meter to this medium, be it quality or quantity, or moreover, the quality of that quantity. joining bullet points or topic headings together do not even begin to qualify as conspiracy theories; they are the ghost of a theory. I may even agree with what is being said but more times I am left thinking go on, explain. many times I am also left with thinking whoa, wait a minute! putting it mildly, that association was a little far reaching for my taste, but there are people who take these associations on as fact.
there is a lot of discussion about gender terminology and gender roles, here's a dual suggestion. teaching children about gender theory using a fictional character in the form a gender unicorn? screw it, teach away and when they have a full understanding, explain it to me. plus the depiction of the gender unicorn looks like a standing hippopotamus with a horn on it's head, with no genatalia, in any form.
Aldi. no problems with the prices - bring it on. I have very simple tastes but it seems that everything I like or want is out of stock.
for more than one episode, the news has broadcast the phenomenon of the demand for Taylor Swift tickets as relevant or 'newsworthy'. please. she's a revlon advertisement for numbskulls. say what you want. the music is awful. if there was a stabbing or even a gun related fatality in the line for tickets, now that would be news.
I could add more but that's enough for now, perhaps explain it all to me. makes me think about aliens from outer space, travelling all that way only to be confronted by a fraction of all this. all I can think of is a map of the solar system and a note for earth. avoid - exhausting.
