this morning the news announced a vaccine with a 90 percent success rate. They spoke to someone from Queensland, a Doctor Paul Griffin, and asked about potential side effects and they said that it needs to be stored at an extremely low temperature. Well that isn't a potential side effect - that is it's nature. Now it's safe to say that the development of this vaccine has been a bit of a rush job. I want a few assurances before I believe the hype.
what's in it? What are it's contents from established practices to new developments in vaccine technology as far as not only potential but actual side effects go? Sorry, you can publish your findings in the Lancet to the world but I want it extensively described, without fear or favor before I go anywhere near it. I don't want to have a "for all I know" moment, I want to make a detailed and informed decision.
even after this, I want to get a legal document for the person giving the vaccine to me stating that if there are any detrimental side effects, I can sue the powers that be for those side effects. Whatever drug administration says everything is fine - well there is already one uncertainty being discussed even this morning in regards to how many doses need to be applied and you should be responsible for your actions, or in this case, assertions. If you don't know - asserting value won't warm the cockles of my heart.
can we also get some actual reporting in regards to this instead of this lazy news? Within the space of the news broadcast I am still watching and I haven't finished writing, the success rate went from 90 percent to 95 percent. They went to some representative from the World Health Organisation and the first question they asked are the world markets must be jumping for joy? What a tacky and stupid thing to ask.
No comments:
Post a Comment